As collective impact has gained traction across the globe, demand has grown for an effective approach to evaluating collective impact initiatives that meets the needs of various interested parties. Collective impact practitioners seek timely, high-quality data that enables reflection and informs strategic and tactical decision making. Funders and other supporters require an approach to performance measurement and evaluation that can offer evidence of progress toward the initiative's goals at different points along the collective impact journey.
This three part series responds to these needs by offering practitioners, funders, and evaluators a way to think about, plan for, and implement different performance measurement and evaluation activities.
This web page is marked up with Schema.org microdata. Much of the necessary microdata is embedded within the HTML that creates the display you see above. The data that shows below is formatted for machine-reading and rounds out the complete descriptive set for this resource. Want more info about all of this? Go here. You can also view the complete dataset for this resource the way a machine sees it here .
Title: Guide to Evaluating Collective Impact Supplement: Sample Questions, Outcomes and Indicators
Publication date 2014-05-05
Publication Year 2014
, Hallie Preskill
, Jennifer Splansky Juster
, Aspen Institute Forum for Community Solutions
, Collective Impact Forum
, performance measurement
Resource provided by IssueLab
IssueLab's Embeddable Widget
Use this super simple form to customize and generate the code you need to display this content in your own environment - no programming required. The feed will inherit more specific styles, like font face and font color, from your website.
Your widget code
Upload Your Capacity Building Resource
Have a guide, toolkit, or other resource that can help someone learn to do evaluation better? Great! Please send us your suggestion, along with your name and email address in case we need to get in touch. Thanks for helping us build the evaluation capacity of the social sector!