Explore Issue Areas

  • Aging
  • Agriculture and Food
  • Animal Welfare
  • Arts and Culture
  • Athletics and Sports
  • Children and Youth
  • Civil Society
  • Community and Economic Development
  • Computers and Technology
  • Consumer Protection
  • Crime and Safety
  • Disabilities
  • Education and Literacy
  • Employment and Labor
  • Energy and Environment
  • LGBTQI
  • Government Reform
  • Health
  • Housing and Homelessness
  • Human Rights and Civil Liberties
  • Humanitarian and Disaster Relief
  • Hunger
  • Immigration
  • International Development
  • Journalism and Media
  • Men
  • Nonprofits and Philanthropy
  • Parenting and Families
  • Peace and Conflict
  • Poverty
  • Prison and Judicial Reform
  • Race and Ethnicity
  • Religion
  • Science
  • Substance Abuse and Recovery
  • Transportation
  • Welfare and Public Assistance
  • Women
  • Help
  • Add to Issuelab
  • Sign in
  • Sign Up
  • About
  • Issue Areas
  • Services
  • News

Measure Results

Need practical "how-to" info that aims to help you build your evaluation capacity? This collection includes suggested readings from our friends at BetterEvaluation, the Center for Evaluation Innovation, the Center for Effective Philanthropy, and Grantmakers for Effective Organizations as well as hand-picked content by IssueLab. Actual evaluations are available at Find Results. This site is part of our #OpenForGood campaign.

"GenY Unfocus Group - KP Digital Health 47613" by Ted Eytan licensed under CC BY-SA 2.0

Readings suggested by

Document Type

Select a category

Issue Areas

Languages

View
  • Funders
  • Publishers
  • Bibliography
Engage
  • Share the Collection
  • Suggest a Report

12 results found

RELEVANCY

  • Relevancy
  • A - Z
  • Newest - Oldest
  • Oldest - Newest
Understanding & Sharing What Works: The State of Foundation Practice

Understanding & Sharing What Works: The State of Foundation Practice

Nov 08, 2018

The Center for Effective Philanthropy (CEP);

The Center for Effective Philanthropy (CEP) surveyed private and community foundation leaders regarding what they know about what is and isn't working in their foundations' efforts to achieve their goals. Drawing from 119 survey responses and in-depth interviews with 41 foundation CEOs, the report finds that while the majority of foundation CEOs believe they understand well what is working in their programmatic efforts, more than 40 percent believe their foundation is not investing enough time and money in developing that understanding.

Practical Innovations in Accountability: Comparative Constituency Feedback

Practical Innovations in Accountability: Comparative Constituency Feedback

May 01, 2017

Keystone Accountability;

This is a tool for obtaining feedback on a program's perception by various stakeholders (it can be applied at different points along the development value chain, between funders and grantees, and between organizations and their primary constituents). It uses a questionnaire to collect perceptions from organizations' constituents on key aspects of the organizations' performance. The questionnaire is administered simultaneously to a comparable constituency group for a cohort of similar organizations.

Benchmarking Foundation Evaluation Practices

Benchmarking Foundation Evaluation Practices

Sep 01, 2016

Center for Evaluation Innovation; The Center for Effective Philanthropy (CEP);

For foundations, there are lots of questions to reflect on when thinking about which evaluation practices best align with their strategy, culture, and mission. How much should a foundation invest in evaluation? What can they do to ensure that the information they receive from evaluation is useful to them? With whom should they share what they have learned?Considering these numerous questions in light of benchmarking data about what other foundations are doing can be informative and important.Developed in partnership with the Center for Evaluation Innovation (CEI), Benchmarking Foundation Evaluation Practices is the most comprehensive data collection effort to date on evaluation practices at foundations. The report shares data points and infographics on crucial topics related to evaluation at foundations, such as evaluation staffing and structures, investment in evaluation work, and the usefulness of evaluation information.Findings in the report are based on survey responses from individuals who were either the most senior evaluation or program staff at foundations in the U.S. and Canada giving at least $10 million annually, or members of the Evaluation Roundtable, a network of foundation leaders in evaluation convened by CEI.

Funder Perspectives: Assessing Media Investments

Funder Perspectives: Assessing Media Investments

Jan 23, 2015

Media Impact Funders;

How are funders evaluating the outcomes of the media productions and campaigns that they support? Over the past five years, this question has informed a growing array of convenings, reports and research initiatives within the philanthropic sector, driving the emergence of a small but increasingly visible field of analysts and producers seeking to both quantify and qualify the impact of public interest media.These examinations have stimulated debate among both funders and grantees. Calls for the creation of a single media impact metric or tool have been met with both curiosity and skepticism. Those in favor of impact analysis cite its strategic usefulness in this moment of myriad new and untested media platforms, the importance of concretely tying mission to outcomes, and the need to justify media investments rather than programmatic ones. Detractors raise concerns about how an excess of evaluation might stifle creativity, needlessly limit funding to those projects whose short-term impact can be conclusively proven, or simply bog grantees down in administrative tasks that require entirely different skills, as well as resources.However, these debates have taken place in somewhat of an information vacuum. To date, the conversation about media impact has been led by a limited group of foundations. Little substantive information is available about how a broader range of funders address questions of evaluation. This research project aims to help fill that gap.The report, Funder Perspectives: Assessing Media Investments explores the multiple and sometimes overlapping lenses through which grantmakers view media evaluation, and confirms that there are still many unanswered questions.

Activity Packet: Tools, Tips, and Resources for Using Surveys

Activity Packet: Tools, Tips, and Resources for Using Surveys

Dec 04, 2014

Los Angeles County Arts Commission;

This activity packet provides tools, tips, and resources for arts organizations to use surveys in their assessments of 

Alliance for Justice Advocacy Capacity Tool (ACT)

Alliance for Justice Advocacy Capacity Tool (ACT)

May 01, 2012

Alliance for Justice; Bolder Advocacy;

This tool assesses the organizational capacity and specifically measures the advocacy capacity of a prospective or current grantee. The tool includes 18 indicators divided into four categories: advocacy goals, plans and strategies; conducting advocacy; advocacy avenues; and organizational operations to sustain advocacy. The tool describes capacities to which an organization should aspire if it wants to institutionalize its advocacy work. Sample measures include "the organization has a well written agenda, adopted by its board, that identifies the organization's priorities (such as issue priorities) for legislative and other types of advocacy."

Born Learning Washington Monthly Media Tracking Form

Born Learning Washington Monthly Media Tracking Form

Dec 05, 2007

Annie E. Casey Foundation; Organizational Research Services (ORS);

Page 24This is a tool that measures strengthened base of media support. It tracks the amount of campaign-generated media visibility that has been developed - noting dimensions such as type of media (TV, radio, print, other) and type of placement (PSA, news story, op-ed, programming).

Campaign Champions Data Collection Tool

Campaign Champions Data Collection Tool

Dec 05, 2007

Annie E. Casey Foundation; Organizational Research Services (ORS);

This is a tool that measures strengthened base of public support. This form tracks and measures the number of "champions" (people who take actions to advance the public will) engaged and the actions these champions undertake as a part of the Born Learning campaign.

Modal content
resource.notifications.documents_incoming

Suggest a Report

Have a guide, toolkit, or other resource that can help someone learn to do evaluation better? Great! Please send us your suggestion, along with your name and email address in case we need to get in touch. Thanks for helping us build the evaluation capacity of the social sector!

×

or BROWSE
Thank you for your suggestion! This window will automatically close.

Share the Collection

Use this form to customize and generate the code you need to display this content in your own environment - no programming required. The feed will inherit more specific styles, like font face and font color, from your website.






Show elements




Your code

Preview

Modal content
resource.notifications.documents_incoming

Suggest a Report

Have a guide, toolkit, or other resource that can help someone learn to do evaluation better? Great! Please send us your suggestion, along with your name and email address in case we need to get in touch. Thanks for helping us build the evaluation capacity of the social sector!

×

or BROWSE
Thank you for your suggestion! This window will automatically close.
THESE LOGOS ARE CALLED IN THRU DBASE

Get free, worthwhile monthly emails from IssueLab!

IssueLab
  • About
  • News
  • Services
Join Us
  • Add to Issuelab
  • Open Knowledge
  • Use Our Data
Support
  • FAQ
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • ToS